<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Skuggi_Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skuggi.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skuggi.net</link>
	<description>Tech Priest?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Skuggi Report: Net Neutrality Made Simple by The Skuggi Report: Net Neutrality Made Simple (via Skuggi_Net) &#171; Pilant&#039;s Business Ethics Blog</title>
		<link>http://skuggi.net/2011/02/04/the-skuggi-report-net-neutrality-made-simple/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Skuggi Report: Net Neutrality Made Simple (via Skuggi_Net) &#171; Pilant&#039;s Business Ethics Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuggi.net/?p=139#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Net Neutrality is seen in two views of recent the first being a savior of the internet and the other it’s doom and to be honest depending on its implication it can be both.   The theory behind Net Neutrality is that it will keep the internet unrestricted, you pay for X level of service and you get that service with no services being blocked.   If one person on one ISP (Comcast, Adelphia, Verizon etc.) can get access to a type of content at the sp &#8230; Read More [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Net Neutrality is seen in two views of recent the first being a savior of the internet and the other it’s doom and to be honest depending on its implication it can be both.   The theory behind Net Neutrality is that it will keep the internet unrestricted, you pay for X level of service and you get that service with no services being blocked.   If one person on one ISP (Comcast, Adelphia, Verizon etc.) can get access to a type of content at the sp &#8230; Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E-Cig Info by Skuggi</title>
		<link>http://skuggi.net/e-cig-info/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skuggi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 05:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skuggi.net/#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated the page with some youtube links and a new forum to check out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated the page with some youtube links and a new forum to check out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

